History Flow at MoMA.
Related academic papers
Studying Cooperation and Conflict between Authors with history flow Visualizations Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, and Kushal Dave. CHI 2004.
Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia.
Fernanda B. Viégas, Martin Wattenberg, Jesse Kriss, Frank van Ham. HICSS-40, 2007.
The colorful history flow diagrams take a lengthy edit history and turn it into a picture. The image above, for instance, shows the history of the Wikipedia article on chocolate. What jumps out? The zigzag pattern at the right. It turns out that this is an argument over whether a certain type of surrealist sculpture exists or not. (For details of the visualization technique, see the IBM project page.)
The first image below is the diagram for the article on abortion.
The black gashes show points where the article has been deleted and
replaced with offensive comments. This type of vandalism turns out to be
common on controversial articles.
Even articles that are not controversial are sometimes targets for
malicious users. The image below shows the history of the article on "history".
The rightmost black slice shows when a user replaced the entire article
with the simple word "ha."
If vandalism is so common, why do you see it so seldom when you look up an article on Wikipedia? We performed a statistical analysis in 2003 to answer this question, and discovered that the median lifetime of certain types of vandalism is measured in minutes. This result has been replicated more recently, both by our lab and researchers at PARC.
History flow diagrams helped us understand Wikipedia in 2003 when it was very young. (Our 2004 CHI paper was the first computer science publication analyzing the online encyclopedia.) Since then, the site has grown enormously and the dynamics have become even more complex.